[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] vfscanf.c namespace clash and paren warning
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] vfscanf.c namespace clash and paren warning |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Apr 2004 23:04:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
As Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> > I don't object, but don't particularly like the idea of a leading
> > underscore either. Maybe renaming them to something more descriptive
> > is better? I don't have a good idea about a better name thoug.
> Yeah, I didn't really like it either, but I couldn't think of a better
> name myself.
scanf_set_bit, and scanf_bit_is_set?
> > That actually fixes a bug. :-o
> I guess I got the parens in the right spot then. ;-)
Yeah, and the compiler was totally right to warn it. Stupid me that I
didn't spot that warning. (But there's way too much compilation output
anyway.)
> Are these ok for 1.0 branch too?
By all means, yes!
--
J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/