Re: [avr-libc-dev] Commit: PRG_RDB -> pgm_read_byte in stdio

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Theodore A. Roth wrote:

> > I just committed the attached patch to HEAD.  It's IMHO also a
> > candidate for 1.0 even though PRG_RDB is still retained there.

> I don't think we gain anything by pulling this into 1.0 since PRG_RDB
> can't be removed there anyways.

OK.  Then I'll just leave the 1.0 branch as it is now.

I only noticed the breakage when trying to compile HEAD...  I fear our
HEAD is too little tested.

> > Would anyone see a problem using the ptr++ notation as the argument to
> > a macro?

> If it can easily be changed to not use the ptr++ in the macro arg, I
> think it should be done even though we know it is safe now.

OK, Eric voted for the same, so I've changed it.  Again, this will happen on
HEAD only.

-- 
J"org Wunsch                                           Unix support engineer
address@hidden        http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/

stdio.diff
Description: Text document