[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-libc-dev] <inttypes.h> vs. <stdint.h>
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
[avr-libc-dev] <inttypes.h> vs. <stdint.h> |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:45:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
I just created <stdint.h>, based on the old <inttypes.h> file. The
new <inttypes.h> file by now just includes <stdint.h>. This is in
line with the C99 standard, and closes savannah bug #9514.
I don't append a CVS diff for this, it would be fairly meaningless.
I eventually plan to add more C99 features to <inttypes.h>.
I'd normally not move this into the 1.0 branch, but OTOH, it wouldn't
hurt either: those who used to #include <inttypes.h> won't see a
change. Opinions?
--
J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
- [avr-libc-dev] <inttypes.h> vs. <stdint.h>,
Joerg Wunsch <=