[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-libc-dev] AW: avr-libc license audit
From: |
Stumpf Michael |
Subject: |
[avr-libc-dev] AW: avr-libc license audit |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 10:13:19 +0100 |
Hello,
I never cared much about licences, so feel free to apply the
modifications as you suggested.
No problem with relicencing the math lib either.
best regards,
Michael Stumpf
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: E. Weddington [mailto:address@hidden
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. November 2004 21:49
> An: address@hidden
> Cc: avr-libc-dev
> Betreff: avr-libc license audit
>
>
> Michael Stumpf,
>
> I've been conducting an audit of the licenses in the files in
> avr-libc
> <http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/avr-libc/>. avr-libc is
> supposed to
> be licensed with a modified BSD license that contains a "no
> endorsement"
> clause. I've discovered a number of files that have incorrect
> licensing
> and are missing this clause including some files where you hold the
> copyright, specifically I am referring to include/ctype.h and
> include/math.h, NOT the math library.
>
> May I have your permission to modify the licenses of the two files in
> avr-libc listed above where you hold the copyright, to add
> the missing
> clause reproduced below?
>
> * Neither the name of the copyright holders nor the names of
> contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
> from this software without specific prior written permission.
>
> If I have your permission please respond to this email that you give
> your permission and be sure to keep the CC to the
> avr-libc-dev mailing
> list where it may be archived.
>
> As a seperate issue, would you be willing to relicense the
> avr-libc math
> library functions written by you to have the Modified BSD
> License (the
> same as the rest of avr-libc)? This would greatly help in making the
> licensing for all of avr-libc consistent. I also understand if you do
> not wish to do this.
>
> Thank you.
> Eric Weddington
> avr-libc developer
>