Re: [avr-libc-dev] PAx missing in iotn26.h

[E. Weddington]

Joerg Wunsch wrote:

> As E. Weddington wrote:
>
>  
>
> > *sigh*. And now it's in 1.2.0.
> >    
>
> 1.2.0 won't be the final release of avr-libc. ;-)
>
> C'mon, nobody really tested the 1.1.x experimental versions.  Only by
> finally pushing it, and release them as 1.2.x, we can eventually find
> all the bugs in it.  (That's basically why I think the Linux-heritage
> even/odd release scheme is not very useful.)
>
>  
Yeah, I always find it hard to remember which is which. Well, perhaps 
the policy can be changed in the future.

> > - Or, I can also change portpins.h to *always* define those, similar
> > to below:
> >    
>
> That sounds the better way to me, too.
>
>  

Will implement as such. Thanks
Eric