[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library
From: |
Colin O'Flynn |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:10:43 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
Hi,
> It depends how exactly you want to compare against zero - perhaps
> check for denormal (test hidden bit with sbrc/sbrs) is sufficient?
> Division by denormal can overflow too, just like division by zero.
What is the support of denormals in avr-libc's FP routines? Are they
[supposed] to be fully supported? If not than the hidden bit test would
probably not create any problems, and wouldn't chew up much more space/speed.
Regards,
-Colin
- [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library, Colin O'Flynn, 2005/01/08
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library, Marek Michalkiewicz, 2005/01/08
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library, Paul Schlie, 2005/01/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library, Paul Schlie, 2005/01/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library, Bob Paddock, 2005/01/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library, Colin O'Flynn, 2005/01/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library, Paul Schlie, 2005/01/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library, Colin O'Flynn, 2005/01/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/09