[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11494] strtol() return wrong value in the unde
From: |
Dmitry K. |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11494] strtol() return wrong value in the underflow case |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:00:53 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 08:15, Dmitry K. wrote:
>
> But if anybody is needing a function, that must return value,
> "at least as 32 bits", it is necessity to write another function,
> with another name, like:
> int32_t strto32 (const char *, char **, int) .
Sorry, a mistake, read it as:
...
"exactly 32 bits length"
...
Thanks.
- [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11494] strtol() return wrong value in the underflow case, anonymous, 2005/01/05
- [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11494] strtol() return wrong value in the underflow case, Eric Weddington, 2005/01/05
- [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11494] strtol() return wrong value in the underflow case, anonymous, 2005/01/06
- [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11494] strtol() return wrong value in the underflow case, Eric Weddington, 2005/01/10
- [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11494] strtol() return wrong value in the underflow case, Eric Weddington, 2005/01/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11494] strtol() return wrong value in the underflow case, Paul Schlie, 2005/01/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11494] strtol() return wrong value in the underflow case, Dmitry K., 2005/01/11
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11494] strtol() return wrong value in the underflow case,
Dmitry K. <=
- [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11494] strtol() return wrong value in the underflow case, anonymous, 2005/01/11
- [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11494] strtol() return wrong value in the underflow case, anonymous, 2005/01/11
- [avr-libc-dev] [bugs #11494] strtol() return wrong value in the underflow case, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/01/25