[avr-libc-dev] Re: gcc's avr implementation does not appear to be interrupt safe!

[E. Weddington]

Paul Schlie wrote:

> Eric, the reason I posted it to only you two, was that it's likely a
> sensitive observation; where I thought you might want to have a chance
> to confirm or correct the observation prior to it being more broadly
> stated that gcc for avr including winavr is inherently unsafe to use in
> many circumstances.
>
>  
>
> > From: "E. Weddington" <address@hidden>
> > And next time please post to a mailing list, preferrably avr-libc-dev
> > (which I've CC'd) where the GCC maintainers (or at least one of them) is
> > listening in.
> >
> > Eric
> >    
>
>
>  

Any information or inquiries about the AVR port of GCC is best when it 
is publically shared. That way everybody can then help in analysing the 
information and make any informed decisions, including to help fix any 
potential problems.

Eric