[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] RFC: deprecate INTERRUPT, and replace it by something
|
From: |
Dmitry K. |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] RFC: deprecate INTERRUPT, and replace it by something less ambiguous |
|
Date: |
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:40:41 +1000 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
On Friday 11 February 2005 03:24, Colin O'Flynn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > I hesitate to rename SIGNAL into INTERRUPT quickly again though, in
> > order to at least ensure for a while that any old program that used
> > INTERRUPT on purpose will fail to compile.
>
> IMHO I would avoid ever cross-naming, as old tutorials and example code
> might then have incorrect definitions of the INTERRUPT() macro. However
> breaking the INTERRUPT macro would either force the user to RTFM or post a
> "HELLPPP" on AVRFreaks/ avr-gcc-list.
>
> I agree with the idea of removing INTERRUPT macro eventually due to
> somewhat confusing name, as well as putting all interrupt related macros in
> one file.
The same opinion.