[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition
From: |
Ron Kreymborg |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:20:01 +1100 |
> Good news... I finished(or so I think) the modification to the script.
>
> I have include two files. First is a XML generated by the first part of
> the script. It use the AVR Studio XML file to do so. Second file is the
> actual ioxxx.h to witch vector patch and pin definition patch have been
> applied.
>
> As a side note, all AT90USB in AVR Studio XML do not containt <PACKAGE>
> information, therefore my script did not work for these(witch result in
> missing information for at90usb2.h and
> at90usb6_7.h)
>
> Comments on the result are welcome
>
> Frédéric Nadeau
Eons ago I did some work on calling interrupts from private methods in C++
classes. The brick wall for me was putting together all the diffs for the
device headers. Would it be possible to add a new line for each interrupt in
this new header generator? Eg extracting a few lines from your example I
have added the vector number:
/* Timer/Counter1 Capture Event */
#define TIMER1_CAPT_num 5
#define TIMER1_CAPT_vect _VECTOR(5)
#define SIG_INPUT_CAPTURE1 _VECTOR(5)
/* Timer/Counter1 Compare Match A */
#define TIMER1_COMPA_num 6
#define TIMER1_COMPA_vect _VECTOR(6)
#define SIG_OUTPUT_COMPARE1A _VECTOR(6)
/* Timer/Counter1 Compare Match B */
#define TIMER1_COMPB_num 7
#define TIMER1_COMPB_vect _VECTOR(7)
#define SIG_OUTPUT_COMPARE1B _VECTOR(7)
Etc, etc,...
I could then submit a patch for the necessary changes to gcc.
Ron
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, (continued)
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/10
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/10
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/11
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/11
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/11
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/12
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/12
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition,
Ron Kreymborg <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/13
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/13
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/13
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/13
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/13
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/16
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/19
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/24
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/25
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Ron Kreymborg, 2009/03/26