Re: can't reproduce documented overflow behavior of _delay_ms()

[Georg-Johann Lay]

Am 04.02.20 um 23:05 schrieb Joerg Wunsch:
> As Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>
> > hmmm.  So there is more work to do for double support?  We definitely do not
> > want double here but float instead...
>
> I disagree.
>
> This is all just happening in temporary variables inside of "static
> inline" functions, and thus completely optimized away by the compiler.
> Thus, the actual argument type doesn't really matter.

As yes, of course.

> With optimizations turned off, all bets for the various _delay*
> functions are gone anyway.

Johann