[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] AldorForAxiom
From: |
Vanuxem Grégory |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] AldorForAxiom |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:19:10 +0100 |
Hi,
Le jeudi 16 mars 2006 à 17:05 +0100, Ralf Hemmecke a écrit :
> Yes, clear, but if I just stay in Axiom, I don't need .o files. Am I wrong?
Yes, you are wrong. The .o file is needed if you want to use compiled
lisp code.
> Aha. And that is also .o? Is this the same object format that comes out
> if I compile a .c file?
Yes. GCL 'translates' lisp code to C and compiles it with gcc (if your
default compiler is gcc of course)
> I would not have expected anything else, but if someone could make my
> search space a bit smaller that would help.
You can begin with src/interp/i-syscmd.boot.pamphlet (search for
compile)
> Well, I simply removed fact.o and started a new Axiom. I said:
>
> )lib fact
> fact 3
>
> and got 6 as result. Which code did I execute?
fact.lsp (the code is interpretated).
Cheers,
Greg
>
> >> That should in priciple be possible once I have libaxiom.al,
> >> I just haven't tried it yet.
>
> > Let me know if you succeed.
>
> I'll post my experience with that.
>
> Ralf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Axiom-developer mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
>