[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb
From: |
Norman Ramsey |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb |
Date: |
Fri, 05 May 2006 10:46:02 -0400 |
> Hello, is somebody so familiar with the documentation of noweb, to point
> exactly at a place in the documentation that says something about what
> noweb SHOULD do if it sees
>
> <<NOT DEFINED CODE CHUNK NAME>>
>
> in either documentation or code chunk?
>
> The only place where I think it would be necessary to escape << is if
> an = sign immediately follows the >> AND the << starts at the first
> column. In all other situations the line should be output by noweb
> literally and NO error message should occurs. Maybe a WARNING (to
> stderr) would be nice, but still errcode=0.
No. Misspelled chunk names or missing chunks should result in errors,
as should chunk names appearing in documentation.
I have made a note that noweb's manual needs to be amended.
Norman
>
> Ralf Hemmecke
>
>
> > | In the file ' src/interp/fnewmeta.lisp.pamphlet' the text:
> > |
> > | <<' Name '>>
> > |
> > | is not really a reference to a chunk but noweb thinks it is
> > | and the standard (designed in) behavior of noweb when it
> > | finds such an "undefined chunk" is simply to omit it. This
> > | breaks the Axiom code.
> > |
> > | Of course would could define this as a chunk using the noweb
> > | escape sequence @<<
> > |
> > | <<' Name '>>=
> > | @<<' Name '>>
> > | @
> > |
> > | and solve this one case where it is really a problem (or even
> > | use the escape sequence inline).
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb / Lisp Skills, (continued)
RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/03
RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/04
RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/04
RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/04
Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/05/04
RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/04
RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/05
RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/05