[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Some latex packages that may help with multiple in
From: |
C Y |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] Some latex packages that may help with multiple individual files in books |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Aug 2006 08:45:00 -0700 (PDT) |
--- Ralf Hemmecke <address@hidden> wrote:
> 1) If you need to edit the pamphlet files to make them work in the
> context of a big book. That sounds as if you have too much time to
> spare.
Not really. I take it you regard the idea as frivolous?
> 2) Where are our priorities? Improving LaTeX or improving
> computational mathematics?
As a literate project I would think typesetting technology and
conventations are very important to our effort. Also different members
of the project with different skill sets may have varying priorities -
those less skilled as mathematical researchers can attack other
problems.
> I could imagine to impose restrictions on the LaTeX packages that are
> approved be used inside an Axiom pamphlet. But do you know all the
> LaTeX packages and the preferences of authors that you feel able to
> decide which package to allow and which package to forbid? I don't.
Surely it could be discussed as it came up. I don't imagine there
would be more than a dozen or so key packages (some of which are
already on our radar screen) and if over time a few more came up we
could deal with it on a case by case basis.
> Hmm, yes, you could call it a bug. In fact, I know LaTeX not well
> enough to understand why it is so difficult to set up a wrapper file
> around a collection of latex files so that each file would appear
> (nearly) identical to the way it would appear as dvi when compiled
> separately.
Because latex packages sometimes change the way output is produced from
commands. If two different packages redefine the same command, there
is a collision and one of the papers won't get what it expects. More
difficult, sometimes there are mutually exclusive options which must be
resolved one way or another between packages.
> The collection should, of course produce running page numbers.
There are also desirable features such as a common table of contents
and index.
> What I don't believe is that you can convince package authors to take
> every effort to keep their package compatible with any other package
> out there. Some people just write a package because they need it for
> their work and then suddenly it becomes useful for others. The was
> probably only a question that the package need to be compatible with
> packages that the original author used.
Probably. But then, for the purposes of Axiom, why not take that
package to the next level and make it a more general tool? I fully
expect that Axiom will eventually push the bounds of LaTeX's
typesetting abilities, and I think this is a good thing. Human
readable mathematical documents are a very interesting problem in
themselves - Knuth solved many of those problems well but some things
like automatic line breaking are still imperfectly solved, at best.
Anyway. It's possible I am underestimating the difficulties involved,
but the only way to know for sure is experimentation.
Cheers,
CY
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com