[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp
From: |
Cliff Yapp |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:59:18 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.4 |
On Sunday 13 August 2006 3:21 am, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> 1. As far as I know, GCL and CLISP are the only open source Lisps that
> run on Windows. CMUCL for sure doesn't and SBCL may not either. CMUCL
> probably never will, but SBCL has a good chance.
I believe ECL also works on Windows, but I don't know too much about it beyond
that.
> 2. I think GCL is faster than CLISP.
Yes, this is what I have heard as well. (Indeed, new-clx on clisp was written
specificly to solve performance issues that the usual clx has, IIRC.)
SBCL has made strides on Windows, but keep in mind some issues are EXTREMELY
difficult to handle in porting and it will likely be a very long time before
sbcl is full featured on both Linux and Windows.
For a quick summary of platforms supported by sbcl, there is this page:
http://sbcl.sourceforge.net/platform-table.html
These are the to-do lists I am aware of for the sbcl port:
http://www.dridus.com/~nyef/TODO.Win32
http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~csr21/TODO.win32
Cheers,
CY
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp, (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/08/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, 2006/08/13
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/08/13
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp, Bill Page, 2006/08/15
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/08/15
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp, Gernot Hueber, 2006/08/16
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp,
Cliff Yapp <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp, Martin Rubey, 2006/08/13
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp, Martin Rubey, 2006/08/13
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp, root, 2006/08/14
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Old Lisp, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky, 2006/08/14