[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile
From: |
Ralf Hemmecke |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:55:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719) |
On 08/20/2006 09:52 PM, Bill Page wrote:
All I wish to point out is that the statements made by you,
Tim, and Ralf about #pile syntax is based only on personal bias
and not on fact.
I am sorry for having started all that.
My reference to 20,000 programmers was in relationship to my
desire that programming in Axiom should be made to seem appealing
to the "next generation". I think associating Axiom (and Aldor in
#pile mode) with Python and Haskell via the (admittedly somewhat
superficial) resemblance of their syntax might be one small PR
step in that direction.
If Bill can attract more people to help with Axiom, I wouldn't care
whether they come because of #pile or other reasons.
More important than #pile or not is that we get more developers.
Let Aldor/Axiom develop and see what people like most.
Perhaps some day there appears a "beautifier" program that translates
between pile and non-pile, so you/we could read the code in the way
you/we like.
Don't waste time arguing about "blanks".
Ralf
- RE: [Axiom-developer] reproducibility of a segmentation fault when the compiler encounters a macro (with $lisp) badly indented, (continued)
- RE: [Axiom-developer] reproducibility of a segmentation fault when the compiler encounters a macro (with $lisp) badly indented, Bill Page, 2006/08/19
- [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/08/19
- Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, root, 2006/08/19
- RE: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Bill Page, 2006/08/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/08/20
- RE: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Bill Page, 2006/08/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/08/20
- RE: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Bill Page, 2006/08/20
- RE: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, C Y, 2006/08/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Martin Rubey, 2006/08/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile,
Ralf Hemmecke <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/08/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] reproducibility of a segmentation fault when the compiler encounters a macro (with $lisp) badly indented, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/08/19