[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex
From: |
Stephen Wilson |
Subject: |
[Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:53:37 -0400 |
Forward to axiom-devel:
From: Stephen Wilson <address@hidden>
Date: 17 Jul 2007 18:53:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Lines: 17
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
--text follows this line--
address@hidden writes:
> I'm puzzled. Why do you say that
>
> \spadcommand{}
>
> and
>
> \begin{chunk}
> \end{chunk}
>
> is not latex? The \spadcommand occurs in the published tutorial
> book, bookvol1.pamphlet, which is formatted by standard latex.
>
> Why do you believe otherwise?
>
> Tim
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/07/19
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, C Y, 2007/07/19
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/07/19
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, C Y, 2007/07/19
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/19
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Andrey G. Grozin, 2007/07/17
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/18
[Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex,
Stephen Wilson <=
[Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/17
[Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/17
[Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/17
[Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/17
[Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/17
[Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/17
[Axiom-developer] Re: Pamphlets and LaTex, Stephen Wilson, 2007/07/17