Re: [be] bibledit-web-0.6

[Oreo Warpok]

Yay!

That worked!

Thanks.

Phil

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Teus Benschop <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi Phil,

There are two archives only because this is a temporal location. The
file will be synchronised to the official location shortly. It is
version 0.6.1, rather than 0.6. Yes, the fix will be applied
automatically when installing version 0.6.1. As for the readme file, the
fix has been mentioned in web/web/help/changelog.tpl, and will display
online after installation at Help / About / ChangeLog.

Teus.

On 02/22/2012 05:37 PM, Oreo Warpok wrote:
> Teus,
>

> All I found at the site you sent is the two archives.
> Is the smarty fix automatically applied when installing from the new .6
> tar.gz?
> Or was that perhaps the wrong link?
> I don't see a special smarty readme file in the tar.gz found at the link.
>
> Phil
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Teus Benschop <address@hidden

> <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Phil,
>
>     There is no need to uninstall the previous version of bibledit-web.
>
>     If the old version is available at site/bibledit, since the new is
>     available from site/bibledit-web, it may be good to remove the old
>     version lest somebody uses it and gets database errors.
>
>     A fix for the problem that the smarty directory was not writeable has
>     been released, and can be obtained from
>     http://bibleconsultants.dyndns.org/downloads/temporal/.
>
>     Once it gets past this hurdle, then after you enter the right
>     credentials for the MySQL database, all should be working again.
>
>     Teus.
>
>     On 02/21/2012 11:53 PM, Oreo Warpok wrote:
>     > Teus,
>     >
>     > In order to install .6, I figured out how to install both parts of
>     smarty.
>     >
>     > Install seems to have worked.
>     >
>     > But I did not uninstall my previous bibledit-web first. Should I have
>     > done that.
>     >
>     > When I activate setup.php I get this:
>     > Inline image 1
>     >
>     > And BE-web says that it Cannot access the database.
>     >
>     > Now what?
>     > thanks,
>     > Phil
>     >
>     >
>     > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Teus Benschop
>     <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>

>     > <mailto:address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>>

>     wrote:
>     >
>     >     It was by the assistance of God, that is clear. As for your
>     case, it now
>     >     drops everything that smells of Java, hence uses less memory.
>     The cost
>     >     is small: Slightly less attractive pages detailing the
>     changes. Teus.
>     >
>     >     On 02/20/2012 09:40 PM, Oreo Warpok wrote:
>     >     > Fantastic!
>     >     > Thanks!
>     >     > Phil
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > ===============

>     > Oreo Phil                 479-524-7005 <tel:479-524-7005>

>     >
>     >       One King to rule them all, One Son to find them,
>     >       One Blood to cleanse them all, And from the dark unbind them.
>     > ===============
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> ===============

> Oreo Phil                 479-524-7005 <tel:479-524-7005>

>
>       One King to rule them all, One Son to find them,
>       One Blood to cleanse them all, And from the dark unbind them.
> ===============

--
===============
Oreo Phil                 479-524-7005

      One King to rule them all, One Son to find them,
      One Blood to cleanse them all, And from the dark unbind them.
===============