Re: [Bug-apl] OpenMP patch, test harness and benchmark

[Juergen Sauermann]

Hi,

I have added a workspace "Performance.apl" that gnuplots performance 
data nicely.

According to that the sequential time (interpretation + malloc) for V+V 
is pretty much 5 uS on my machine,
plus the length-dependant computation time

/// Jürgen


On 03/15/2014 08:23 PM, David B. Lamkins wrote:
> See attached files.
>
> Configured using ASSERT_LEVEL_WANTED=0, the execution ratio improved
> slightly to about 2:1.
>
> Note that this test uses a wider range of ravel lengths. The execution
> time ratio is pretty much constant, falling off only for the smallest
> (100 element) ravels.
>
> I did monitor the system this time. All 8 cores were busy at near to
> 100% utilization. Memory utilization remained below the swap threshold
> during the entire test.