[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension
From: |
David B. Lamkins |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface) |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:22:37 -0700 |
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 12:43 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
[big snip]
Sorry about the C++ and Java comments. Read that as me venting my own
frustrations having used both languages. It's not that either approach
is inherently bad; it's just that I don't particularly care for the path
those two communities have taken.
> At the end of the day, I don't have any particular preferences and I
> could even live with no namespaces at all. What is important however
> is that we have a standardised way of packaging libraries and
> extensions.
Yes!
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), (continued)
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), Juergen Sauermann, 2014/04/23
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), Blake McBride, 2014/04/22
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), Peter Teeson, 2014/04/22
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), enztec, 2014/04/23
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), Juergen Sauermann, 2014/04/23
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), Peter Teeson, 2014/04/23
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), Juergen Sauermann, 2014/04/23
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), David B. Lamkins, 2014/04/23
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), David B. Lamkins, 2014/04/24
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), Elias Mårtenson, 2014/04/25
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface),
David B. Lamkins <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), Juergen Sauermann, 2014/04/24
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), Elias Mårtenson, 2014/04/25
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), David B. Lamkins, 2014/04/25
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), Juergen Sauermann, 2014/04/25
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), enztec, 2014/04/25
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), David B. Lamkins, 2014/04/25
- Re: [Bug-apl] A call for justification of feature / library / extension proposals (was Re: Tk/Tcl interface), Elias Mårtenson, 2014/04/24