Re: [Bug-apl] Requests for gnu-apl-mode

[David B. Lamkins]

On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 12:55 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> As for the edit buffer, you can always kill the frame and opening it
> again. That's always completely safe, as it never performs any
> destructive operation until you press C-c C-c. 
> 

Cool.

> You can also undo as far back as you want. I suppose I could add a
> revert operation that replaces the content of the edit buffer with the
> current function definition from the interpreter. The effect would be
> identical to killing the buffer and opening it again. I am curious
> though as to what specific workflow you have where you need it. :-) 

No specific use-case. It's comparable in practice to revert-buffer,
which I sometimes use when I' editing a file not under version control.