[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-apl] ]usercmd patch attached
From: |
David B. Lamkins |
Subject: |
[Bug-apl] ]usercmd patch attached |
Date: |
Sat, 17 May 2014 11:21:22 -0700 |
Here's a patch to let ]usercmd accept restatement of an existing user
command definition so long as the associated function name and mode are
identical.
]usercmd ]foo foo 1
User-defined command ]foo installed.
]usercmd ]foo foo 1
⍝ without the patch there'd be a BAD COMMAND response here
]usercmd ]foo foo
BAD COMMAND
⍝ correct: mode differs
)more
conflict with existing user command definition in command ]USERCMD
]usercmd ]foo goo 1
BAD COMMAND
⍝ correct: function name differs
)more
conflict with existing user command definition in command ]USERCMD
]help
Commands are:
)CHECK
[... snip ...]
]XTERM [ON or OFF]
User defined commands:
]foo → A foo B (mode 1)
⍝ initial definition is still present
lamkins-usercmd.patch
Description: Text Data
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug-apl] ]usercmd patch attached,
David B. Lamkins <=