Re: [Bug-apl] Handling of unterminated strings

[Elias Mårtenson]

By the way, I notice that if you type:

      'foo

Then you get a SYNTAX ERROR which has )MORE information, but there is no plus sign after the error message.

When typing ⍎"foo'" you do get the + sign together with the SYNTAX ERROR.

Regards,

Elias

On 20 May 2014 22:05, Elias Mårtenson <address@hidden> wrote:

Thank you. I really appreciate it.

Regards,

Elias

On 20 May 2014 21:52, Juergen Sauermann <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi Blake, Elias,

OK, I changed this in SVN 278.

/// Jürgen

On 05/20/2014 07:29 AM, Blake McBride wrote:

I agree.  I was surprised a couple of times when GNU APL automatically terminated a string.  I don't remember APL automatically terminating strings.  I think I'd rather see an error too.

Just an opinion.

Thanks.

Blake

On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Elias Mårtenson <address@hidden> wrote:

Hello Jürgen,

I know that you consider parsing unterminated strings to be a feature, but I would ask you to reconsider this.

It is my personal opinion that this causes more opportunities for confusion than potential benefits. I would like to share the latest such problem that I came across:

I was looking at how GNU APL was parsing complex numbers, and I typed the following:

      ⍎'2J3"

 2J3

Note how I had accidentally terminated the string using a double quote instead of a single quote. This was a typo on my part.

If unterminated strings had resulted in an error, as I am proposing, I woul dhave gotten a SYNTAX ERROR (probably) and I my mistake would have been clear. Instead, it looked almost correct.

I did notice that there was a space preceding the complex number, so I did this:

      8⎕CR ⍎'2J3"

┌→──────┐

│2J3 ┌⊖┐│

│    │ ││

│    └─┘│

└∊──────┘

OK, now I was really confused. It took a while for me to figure out that I had actually been bitten by the unterminated array feature twice in a single statement: First, the input was parsed by GNU APL as ⍎'2J3"'. Then, the lamp function interpreted its argument 2J3" as 2J3"", yielding a two-element array consisting of a complex number and an empty array.

I think not giving an error in this case causes more confusion than it's worth.

Finally, when reading the evaluation sequence in section 6.1.1 of the standard, I interpret that as this is required to signal syntax-error in this situation.

Regards,

Elias