Re: [Bug-apl] BAD FUNCTION HEADER

[Blake McBride]

Works perfectly.  Thanks!!  (never knew about recursive editing...)

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Juergen Sauermann <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi Blake,

thanks, fixed in SVN 343.

Please note that I have no plans to implement recursive ∇ (opening a new function
while editing another).

/// Jürgen

On 06/26/2014 04:58 PM, Blake McBride wrote:

IBM APL:

CLEAR WS

      ∇TEST

[1]   ∇

      )FNS

TEST

      ∇TEST

[1]   [0]

[0]   TEST2

[1]   ∇

      )FNS

TEST  TEST2

 

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Blake McBride <address@hidden> wrote:

On a new function:

      ∇test

[1] [0]

[0] test2

BAD FUNCTION HEADER

[0] 

On an existing function:

      ∇Aln

[4] [0]

[0] Aln

[1] [0]

[0] abc

BAD FUNCTION HEADER

[0] Aln

[1] 

The system doesn't like name changing.

Thanks.

Blake

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Juergen Sauermann <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi Blake,

thanks, fixed in SVN 342.

/// Jürgen

On 06/25/2014 03:46 AM, Blake McBride wrote:

      )CLEAR

CLEAR WS

      ∇test

[1] [0]

BAD FUNCTION HEADER

[0] 

I noticed the bug when I attempted to edit the header of an existing function.

Thanks.

Blake