[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] Extension proposal: ⍵⍵ to access outer lambda
From: |
Kacper Gutowski |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] Extension proposal: ⍵⍵ to access outer lambda |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jul 2014 02:03:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On 2014-07-09 16:14:32, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> actually - no. I called it OUTER_OMEGA to make clear what it does.
> Maybe you like
>
> { ⍵ + {⍵×WW} 10 ⊣ WW←⍵ } 100
> 1100
>
> imore?
I think the main problem isn't the length of variable's name but the
fact that regular variable is neither lexically scoped nor localized.
Using ⍵⍵ might be confusing for Dyalog users where ⍺⍺ and ⍵⍵ are used
as functional arguments of dfn operators. But since GNU APL uses ⍶
and ⍹ for those and it doesn't localize variables in dfns, using
repeated ⍺/⍵ for nested arguments doesn't sound that bad.
-k
- [Bug-apl] Extension proposal: ⍵⍵ to access outer lambda, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/07/09
- Re: [Bug-apl] Extension proposal: ⍵⍵ to access outer lambda, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/07/09
- Re: [Bug-apl] Extension proposal: ⍵⍵ to access outer lambda, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/07/10
- Re: [Bug-apl] Extension proposal: ⍵⍵ to access outer lambda, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/07/09
- Re: [Bug-apl] Extension proposal: ⍵⍵ to access outer lambda,
Kacper Gutowski <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] Extension proposal: ⍵⍵ to access outer lambda, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/07/11
- Re: [Bug-apl] Extension proposal: ⍵⍵ to access outer lambda, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/07/20
- Re: [Bug-apl] Extension proposal: ⍵⍵ to access outer lambda, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/07/20
- Re: [Bug-apl] Extension proposal: ⍵⍵ to access outer lambda, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/07/10
- Re: [Bug-apl] Extension proposal: ⍵⍵ to access outer lambda, Jay Foad, 2014/07/10