[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser?
|
From: |
Jay Foad |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:06:13 +0000 |
On 25 November 2014 at 13:38, Juergen Sauermann
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I have read the IBM binding rules a number of times but they seem not to
> help. The problem of these rules is
> that they give different results in the cases where / is an operator and
> where / is a function.
In IBM APL2 / is always an operator.
Jay.
- [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser?, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/11/25
- Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser?, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/11/25
- Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser?,
Jay Foad <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser?, Jay Foad, 2014/11/25
- Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser?, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/11/25
- Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser?, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/11/26
- Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser?, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/11/26
- Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser?, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/11/27
- Re: [Bug-apl] Bug in the parser?, Jay Foad, 2014/11/27