[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name
From: |
David B. Lamkins |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2016 21:06:05 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:46:21AM +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> On 22 March 2016 at 10:43, David B. Lamkins <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
> FWIW, apl-pkg is much more than a wrapper around an external editor.
> Similar to gnu-apl-mode, apl-pkg provides a number of tools for
> programming-in-the-large.
>
> Of course. I did not intend to disparage your (or anybody else's) work.
> My intention was to raise the level of discussion from a small
> implementation detail as to how to start an external editor to the more
> important issue of how to provide a pleasurable development environment
> (which the commandline+external editor is not, IMHO).
Understood. If I gave the impression that I took offense, it was unintentional.
I only wanted to add a bit of exposition for the benefit of folks who don't
remember aplwrap.
>
> Before aplwrap and apl-pkg I very much liked gnu-apl-mode. A couple
> years back -- after having used Emacs for four decades -- I wanted
> to *finally* learn vi, so I ditched Emacs and switched everything
> over to vim (and more recently, vis).
>
> As someone who lives in Emacs, and have done so since the late 80's, I
> find it surprising that you decided to move to vi, but that's not for
> me to judge. :-)
> My personal opinion is that Emacs is the awesomest thing ever, but the
> more tools the better. :-)
Believe me, I know. :) I'm one of those Emacs users who used Emacs for
*everything*. Log in, start Emacs, do all of my work (and mail, and news, and
web, and music, and ...), and log out. :)
But after forty years, several bouts with RSI (mostly pointer-related, but also
"Emacs pinky") and numerous occasions of having to work as a guest on systems
where Emacs wasn't installed, I figured it was time to learn vi. (Nano, of
course, is broadly available but not especially helpful.) It took me about
three weeks to make the transition.
> Regards,
> Elias
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:address@hidden
- [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Christian Robert, 2016/03/18
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/03/19
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/03/19
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Christian Robert, 2016/03/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/03/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Christian Robert, 2016/03/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, David B. Lamkins, 2016/03/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/03/21
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name,
David B. Lamkins <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/03/22
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, Christian Robert, 2016/03/23
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, David B. Lamkins, 2016/03/24
- Re: [Bug-apl] Near Proof of concept of an )edit somefunction_name, David B. Lamkins, 2016/03/28