[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator
From: |
Kacper Gutowski |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Aug 2016 18:27:05 +0200 |
I like the second of the proposed solutions. Since ambivalent function
can always be called monadically, I think that making the header of
d-fns always λ←⍺ λ1 ⍵ regardless of whether ⍺ occurs in the body or not,
shouldn't break anything and would only make a language a bit simpler.
Although maybe a bit less consistent, because there would still be a
need to distinguish d-ops.
-k
- [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator, Louis de Forcrand, 2016/08/13
- Re: [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator,
Kacper Gutowski <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/08/13
- Re: [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/08/13
- Re: [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/08/14
- Re: [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator, Jay Foad, 2016/08/15
Re: [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator, Jay Foad, 2016/08/15
- Re: [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/08/15
- Re: [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator, Jay Foad, 2016/08/15
- Re: [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator, Louis de Forcrand, 2016/08/15
- Re: [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator, Christian Robert, 2016/08/15
- Re: [Bug-apl] A couple of bugs, and a question on the power operator, Louis de Forcrand, 2016/08/15