[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-apl] compiling
From: |
enztec |
Subject: |
[Bug-apl] compiling |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jan 2017 09:35:35 -0700 |
is there a preferred order to compiling the apl binary and libapl
does doing one before the other deprive something of something? :) all file
sizes seem the exact same except of course libapl.h/.la/.so and bin/apl
depending on whether --with-libapl is used
i am doing the libapl first then the apl binary
---
make distclean gives a lot of
rm -f Makefile
make[2]: Leaving directory `/transfer/usr.src/apl/apl-866/src/testcases'
make[2]: Entering directory `/transfer/usr.src/apl/apl-866/src'
Makefile:901: .deps/apl-Archive.Po: No such file or directory
Makefile:902: .deps/apl-ArrayIterator.Po: No such file or directory
Makefile:903: .deps/apl-Assert.Po: No such file or directory
Makefile:904: .deps/apl-Avec.Po: No such file or directory
Makefile:905: .deps/apl-Backtrace.Po: No such file or directory
Makefile:906: .deps/apl-Bif_F12_FORMAT.Po: No such file or directory
....
i guess using make clean is the preferred way?
- [Bug-apl] compiling,
enztec <=