|
From: | Juergen Sauermann |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-apl] update for the help.def |
Date: | Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:44:15 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 |
Hi, the Oxford Comma is definitely broken because 'and' is dyadic: 1, 2, 3, ∧ 4 VALENCE ERROR 1,2,3,∧4 ^ 1, 2, 3 ∧ 4 1 2 12 /// Jürgen On 04/26/2017 04:29 PM, address@hidden
wrote:
http://www.theonion.com/americanvoices/oxford-comma-wins-court-case-workers-55578 On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:25:52 +0200 Juergen Sauermann <address@hidden> wrote:Hi, this sentence is the verbatim copy of the phrase proposed in https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt (chapter 17) and I do not feel like criticising the GNU project for their spelling. /// Jürgen On 04/22/2017 12:28 AM, address@hidden wrote: Thanks you guys doing this )help is really appreciated - maybe I can make a contribution too line 13 but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of ; -> , for oxford comma? references : https://www.grammarly.com/blog/what-is-the-oxford-comma-and-why-do-people-care-so-much-about-it/ http://www.necn.com/news/new-england/Missing-Comma-Could-Cost-Maine-Company-Millions-416458593.html On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 23:01:01 +0200 Alexey Veretennikov <address@hidden> wrote: Hi, Sure here it is. Don't expect anything big in it - it is just a couple of lines of text. |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |