Re: sparse vector 'without' returns ⍬ with sufficiently large vector

[Kacper Gutowski]

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 08:14:46PM +0200, Dr. Jürgen Sauermann wrote:
> Could you please reformulate the problem in a more readable way?
> I have not idea what the expression is doing and  if the result is correct or
> not.
> Or which primitive actually fails.

I understand the problem is as described in the subject.  
Here's a less verbose reproducer:

      ]BOXING 8
      (3600 ↑1) ~ 0
┌→┐
│1│
└─┘
      (3601 ↑1) ~ 0   ⍝ should also be ,1
┌⊖┐
│0│
└─┘

-k