[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug c++/94905] [10 Regression] Bogus warning -Werror=maybe-uninitialize
From: |
manu at gcc dot gnu.org |
Subject: |
[Bug c++/94905] [10 Regression] Bogus warning -Werror=maybe-uninitialized |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Sep 2020 18:46:43 +0000 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94905
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Bogus warning |[10 Regression] Bogus
|-Werror=maybe-uninitialized |warning
| |-Werror=maybe-uninitialized
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2020-09-03
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #3)
> The best I've been able to come up with is the following, reduced from APL
> 1.8:
It is warning about this, but it should not warn:
# DEBUG rD.2406 => (intD.9) (ivtmp.24_6 /[ex] 4) + 1
[./example.cpp:8:27] # VUSE <.MEM_11>
pretmp_8 = MEM[(intD.9 *)&retD.2381 + ivtmp.24_13 * 1];
This is regression but not sure when it was introduced.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You reported the bug.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug c++/94905] [10 Regression] Bogus warning -Werror=maybe-uninitialized,
manu at gcc dot gnu.org <=