|
From: | Chris Down |
Subject: | Change in SIGTERM behaviour in bash 4.3 when using readline |
Date: | Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:18:24 +0000 |
Hi there,A question on Unix & Linux Stack Exchange[0] brought up the question of SIGTERM terminating interactive bash shells. This surprised me, and after bisecting I narrowed it down to commit ac50fbac ("Bash-4.3 distribution sources and documentation").
Going through the commit I see a significant number of changes, like the addition of setting/checking the sigterm_received atomic in a number of places, and the special handling of some signals (including SIGTERM) as part of deciding whether to call rl_signal_event_hook.
It seems this behaviour is related to readline, because it goes away if I run with --noediting.
Before I spend the time to look through the code to work out exactly which part of ac50fbac results in this behaviour, since it's fairly substantial, I want to double check -- was this an intentional change or not? I can't really tell from CHANGES or NEWS: they mention some of the compile-time options around SIGTERM and rl_signal_event_hook, but I can't really tell the intent when it comes to this behaviour in particular. Certainly it came as a surprise to me, at least.
Thanks, Chris 0: https://unix.stackexchange.com/q/571123/10762
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |