[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns
From: |
L A Walsh |
Subject: |
Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Jun 2021 13:29:05 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) |
On 2021/06/06 07:19, Alain D D Williams wrote:
The important thing is that there is no intention to oppress/denigrate/...
But it does _suggest_ that the default user is a male.
or, speaking about historical use, that the default user was
male. The problem comes when someone reads gendered language
often and long enough, it becomes natural in one's speech and
writing to follow that example.
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, (continued)
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Alain D D Williams, 2021/06/06
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Oğuz, 2021/06/06
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Léa Gris, 2021/06/06
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Dima Pasechnik, 2021/06/07
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Alain D D Williams, 2021/06/07
- Message not available
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Dima Pasechnik, 2021/06/07
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Alain D D Williams, 2021/06/07
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Oğuz, 2021/06/07
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Chet Ramey, 2021/06/07
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Chet Ramey, 2021/06/16
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns,
L A Walsh <=
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Greg Wooledge, 2021/06/06
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Jesse Hathaway, 2021/06/07
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Derek Fawcus, 2021/06/06
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, L A Walsh, 2021/06/07
- Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Chet Ramey, 2021/06/16
Re: Prefer non-gender specific pronouns, Lawrence Velázquez, 2021/06/05