[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jun 2024 11:14:42 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 6/19/24 6:12 PM, konsolebox wrote:
Alternatively, have BASH_SOURCE always produce real physical paths
either by default or through a shopt.
This is the best option. I don't think changing bash to do this by default
would have negative side-effects.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Will Allan, 2024/06/19
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Léa Gris, 2024/06/19
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, konsolebox, 2024/06/19
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Martin D Kealey, 2024/06/26
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Léa Gris, 2024/06/26
- Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Martin D Kealey, 2024/06/26
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, Oğuz, 2024/06/19
Re: proposed BASH_SOURCE_PATH, alex xmb sw ratchev, 2024/06/21