[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@
From: |
Lawrence Velázquez |
Subject: |
Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@ |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Aug 2024 23:54:47 -0400 |
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024, at 11:49 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> Correct. Since you're using $* unquoted in a context where field
> splitting is performed, the shell does not expand it to a single
> field.
That is, unless there's a single positional parameter that is not
further split.
--
vq
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, (continued)
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/22
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/22
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Greg Wooledge, 2024/08/22
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/23
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/26
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/26
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Robert Elz, 2024/08/24
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/24
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/24
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Lawrence Velázquez, 2024/08/24
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@,
Lawrence Velázquez <=
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/26
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/26
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Robert Elz, 2024/08/25
- Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2024/08/26
Re: Question on $@ vs $@$@, alex xmb sw ratchev, 2024/08/26