Re: [feature request] Add ".sh" or ".bash" extension to tmpfile generated by `fc`

[shynur .]

Oğuz:
>
> shynur:
> >
> > Oğuz:
> > >
> > > shynur:
> > > >
> > > > "bash-fc.Esf9by", which seldom benefits from editors
> > > > that use *suffixes* to infer what syntax highlighting
> > > > should be enabled.
> > >
> > > For example?
> >
> > When Emacs opens a file named "bash-fc.NNNNNN.bash", it'll
> > enable sh-mode automatically
>
> Vim does that without the .bash extension. What stops Emacs
> from doing the same?

Editors needn't give "bash-fc.NNNNNN" special handling, IMO.
Because simply adding a ".bash" extension can take care of
ALL editors, once and for ALL.

You were just looking for a chance to show off from the start,
weren't you?  After all there's no need to say "for example?"
at the very beginning, otherwise I won't post this FR.  You
win.  Vim did a good job this time.  Applause...