Re: printf inconsistent results for %.0f

[Chet Ramey]

On 9/19/24 1:39 AM, Stephane Chazelas wrote:

> > > Looks like printf(3) gets called with a `Lf' conversation specifier and
> > > a double argument.
> >
> > Yes, I came to the same conclusion with an essentially identical fix.
> [...]
>
> Would it be possible to have a 5.2 patch released with the
> backport of those two fixes?

Sure, when I get a chance I'll do the patch engineering. Here's what it
will be.

--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

033-printf-strtold
Description: Text document

OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature