[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Dec 2024 21:20:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
On Dez 09 2024, Mike Jonkmans wrote:
> So, with 'if false; then :; fi', the whole if has 0 as status, due to #1.
> The last pipeline is the 'false' command. So $PIPESTATUS = 1.
Why is `if false; then :; fi' not a pipeline? It is a command, and the
components of a pipeline are commands.
> Both other examples, e.g. 'if false; then :; fi | true',
> are, for PIPESTATUS purposes, equivalent to: 'true | true'.
Why is `if false; then :; fi' not equivalent to `true' above?
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
- PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, Ulrich Müller, 2024/12/09
- Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, microsuxxor, 2024/12/09
- Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, Mike Jonkmans, 2024/12/09
- Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, Mike Jonkmans, 2024/12/09
- Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, Andreas Schwab, 2024/12/09
- Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, Dale R. Worley, 2024/12/09
- Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, microsuxxor, 2024/12/09
- Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, Dale R. Worley, 2024/12/10
- Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, Mike Jonkmans, 2024/12/10
- Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, Andreas Schwab, 2024/12/10
- Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, microsuxxor, 2024/12/10
- Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, Ulrich Müller, 2024/12/10
- Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, microsuxxor, 2024/12/10