[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:01:49 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 12/11/24 9:54 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
This needs to be corrected to note that compound commands that are not
one component of a multi-command pipeline do not cound as pipelines for
setting PIPESTATUS. Exactly which compounds commands don't set
PIPESTATUS needs to be made clear as it's not at all obvious.
I'll add something enumerating the commands that set PIPESTATUS.
"processes" should probably be changed to "commands" as that's what
they're called in the documentation.
Probably.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, Chet Ramey, 2024/12/10
Re: PIPESTATUS differs from $? for compound command, Dale R. Worley, 2024/12/11