Re: Possible Linker Bug with static template member on Solaris

[Axel Habermann]

Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

> Axel Habermann <address@hidden> writes:
>
>  
>
> > Now this looks more like an assembler bug to me.
> >    
>
> Perhaps.  Certainly the assembler should not set the CONTENTS or LOAD
> flags.  I don't know if there a way for the compiler to tell the
> assembler this when using the Solaris syntax for the .section
> pseudo-op.  What does the Solaris assembler do with this input?  Does
> it set the section type to SHT_NOBITS or SHT_PROGBITS?
>
>  
Section Header[511]:  sh_name: 
.gnu.linkonce.b._ZN19InternalNotificatorI12ChangeRecordE14notificatorMapE
   sh_addr:      0               sh_flags:   [ SHF_WRITE  SHF_ALLOC ]
   sh_size:      0x4             sh_type:    [ SHT_PROGBITS ]
   sh_offset:    0x68398         sh_entsize: 0
   sh_link:      0               sh_info:    0
   sh_addralign: 0x4

> >        .weak   _ZN19InternalNotificatorI12ChangeRecordE14notificatorMapE
> >        .section
> > .gnu.linkonce.b._ZN19InternalNotificatorI12ChangeRecordE14notificatorMapE,"aw",@nobits
> >    
>
> Here the explicit @nobits tells the assembler what to do.
>
> Ian
>  
Axel