[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gas/336] gas cannot assemble pdtlb,l instruction
From: |
randolph at tausq dot org |
Subject: |
[Bug gas/336] gas cannot assemble pdtlb,l instruction |
Date: |
27 Aug 2004 17:01:59 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From randolph at tausq dot org 2004-08-27 17:01
-------
Subject: Re: gas cannot assemble pdtlb,l instruction
> I do not believe that this instruction is valid. The "x" field of the
> instruction needs to be a register name.
>
> According to the "PA-RISC 2.0 Architecture" document, chapter 7, page
> 7-106 the format for the instruction is:
>
> PDTLB,scope,cmplt x(s,b)
so, apparently, gas thinks that:
pdtlb 0(%r29) -> valid for .level 1.1 or .level 2.0
pdtlb %r0(%r29) -> ditto
pdtlb,l 0(%r29) -> invalid always
pdtlb,l %r0(%r29) -> valid iff .level 2.0
i can't say that this is strictly wrong, just seems inconsistent :)
randolph
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=336
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug gas/336] New: gas cannot assemble pdtlb,l instruction, tausq at debian dot org, 2004/08/17
- [Bug gas/336] gas cannot assemble pdtlb,l instruction, nickc at redhat dot com, 2004/08/27
- [Bug gas/336] gas cannot assemble pdtlb,l instruction, randolph at tausq dot org, 2004/08/27
- [Bug gas/336] gas cannot assemble pdtlb,l instruction, nickc at redhat dot com, 2004/08/27
- [Bug gas/336] gas cannot assemble pdtlb,l instruction, randolph at tausq dot org, 2004/08/27
- [Bug gas/336] gas cannot assemble pdtlb,l instruction,
randolph at tausq dot org <=
- [Bug gas/336] gas cannot assemble pdtlb,l instruction, nickc at redhat dot com, 2004/08/31