[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/371] New: XPASS for "undefined function" and "undefined line" te
From: |
michaelb at ieee dot org |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/371] New: XPASS for "undefined function" and "undefined line" tests in ld/testsuite/ld-undefined/undefined.exp |
Date: |
8 Sep 2004 06:34:34 -0000 |
These tests are marked as XPASS for sh-*-* in
ld/testsuite/ld-undefined/undefined.exp, along with comments that suggest that
any target that uses ELF/DWARF2 will suffer from problems that will mean the
tests will fail. However the tests now seem to pass for sh-elf.
Does this mean that they should no longer be marked as XFAIL for sh-*-*
(because some SH specific fix has been made), or should they no longer be
marked as XFAIL for any ELF based targets (because the general problems with
targets using ELF/DWARF2 have been fixed)?
--
Summary: XPASS for "undefined function" and "undefined line"
tests in ld/testsuite/ld-undefined/undefined.exp
Product: binutils
Version: 2.15
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: michaelb at ieee dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: sh-unknown-elf
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=371
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug ld/371] New: XPASS for "undefined function" and "undefined line" tests in ld/testsuite/ld-undefined/undefined.exp,
michaelb at ieee dot org <=