[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/829] New: Why is gcc -static required to avoid "gprof: gmo
From: |
john at cs dot york dot ac dot uk |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/829] New: Why is gcc -static required to avoid "gprof: gmon.out file is missing call-graph data" error? |
Date: |
6 Apr 2005 16:42:26 -0000 |
I don't know whether this is a genuine bug, or something that the manual doesn't
explain (it doesn't) but I see:
$ gcc -pg -g -c main.c
$ gcc -o a.out main.o -pg
$ ./a.out
$ gprof
gprof: gmon.out file is missing call-graph data
$
If I then add '-static' to the second gcc, all is well. (The contents of main.c
seem to be irrelevant.)
--
Summary: Why is gcc -static required to avoid "gprof: gmon.out
file is missing call-graph data" error?
Product: binutils
Version: 2.15
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: john at cs dot york dot ac dot uk
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,john at cs dot york dot ac
dot uk
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=829
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/829] New: Why is gcc -static required to avoid "gprof: gmon.out file is missing call-graph data" error?,
john at cs dot york dot ac dot uk <=