[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/2342] linkonce debug is broken
From: |
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/2342] linkonce debug is broken |
Date: |
15 Feb 2006 23:06:15 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-02-15
23:06 -------
I think we all agree that the ideal ld behaviour would be to strip out debug
info corresponding to removed linkonce sections. Failing that, I claim that
marking the debug info in some way as invalid is the next best solution. At
least that gives gdb a chance to discard the info. That is what we are trying
to do by putting a zero in debug info address fields.
Your patch caused other gdb problems, specifically, gdb miscalculated the
address range for a compilation unit, which led to gdb reporting file and line
number wrongly for a breakpoint set in another compilation unit.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2342
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/2342] New: linkonce debug is broken, hjl at lucon dot org, 2006/02/15
- [Bug ld/2342] linkonce debug is broken, hjl at lucon dot org, 2006/02/15
- [Bug ld/2342] linkonce debug is broken,
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au <=
- [Bug ld/2342] linkonce debug is broken, hjl at lucon dot org, 2006/02/15
- [Bug ld/2342] linkonce debug is broken, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2006/02/15
- [Bug ld/2342] linkonce debug is broken, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2006/02/15
- [Bug ld/2342] linkonce debug is broken, hjl at lucon dot org, 2006/02/15
- [Bug ld/2342] linkonce debug is broken, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2006/02/15
- [Bug ld/2342] linkonce debug is broken, hjl at lucon dot org, 2006/02/16