[Bug ld/2613] New: testcase for binutils:ld on alpha fails.

[tomri at gmx dot net]

=== ld tests ===

Schedule of variations:
    unix

Running target unix
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for 
target.
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using
/home/rpmbuild/rpm/BUILD/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/ld/testsuite/config/default.exp as
tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running
/home/rpmbuild/rpm/BUILD/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/ld/testsuite/ld-alpha/alpha.exp 
...
FAIL: TLS -fpic -shared
FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec
FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec -relax

Running
/home/rpmbuild/rpm/BUILD/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/sec64k.exp ...
FAIL: ld-elf/64ksec
Running
/home/rpmbuild/rpm/BUILD/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/ld/testsuite/ld-elfcomm/elfcomm.exp
...
Running
/home/rpmbuild/rpm/BUILD/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvers/vers.exp 
...
FAIL: vers24a
FAIL: vers24b
FAIL: vers24c
FAIL: vers30
FAIL: vers31

Running
/home/rpmbuild/rpm/BUILD/binutils-2.16.91.0.6/ld/testsuite/ld-pie/pie.exp ...
FAIL: weak undefined

               === ld Summary ===

# of expected passes            209
# of unexpected failures        10
# of expected failures          32
# of untested testcases         6


Some tests of glibc on alpha also fails, so I don't know if glibc is ok.
glibc-2.4-4 from FC5 builds without break on alpha.

Installed glibc: glibc-2.3.2-11.9

-- 
           Summary: testcase for binutils:ld on alpha fails.
           Product: binutils
           Version: 2.16
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: ld
        AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
        ReportedBy: tomri at gmx dot net
                CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2613

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.