[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binutils-2.18 on Solaris 2.6 - ld_elf32_sparc_emulation
From: |
Gary E Barnes |
Subject: |
Re: binutils-2.18 on Solaris 2.6 - ld_elf32_sparc_emulation |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:23:39 -0800 |
That is what it was. Thank you. There is a line in genscripts.sh that
says,
local lineno=$[${BASH_LINENO[0]} + 1]
That line produced "../../binutils-2.18/ld/genscripts.sh:
${BASH_LINENO[0]} + 1: bad substitution" messages but nothing failed (make
saw no error status). If I change that line to "local lineno=42" then
eelf32_sparc.c is no longer empty and the linking of ld-new completes.
Gary
Alan Modra <address@hidden>
11/12/2007 01:42 PM
To
Gary E Barnes/Cupertino/address@hidden
cc
address@hidden
Subject
Re: binutils-2.18 on Solaris 2.6 - ld_elf32_sparc_emulation
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:39:18AM -0800, Gary E. Barnes wrote:
>
> The ld-new executable (module ldemul.o) expects ld_elf32_sparc_emulation
to
> come from somewhere. It apparently does not exist. The only two places
in
> the source code where that name is present are both in ldemul-list.h.
>
> ./ld/ldemul-list.h:2:extern ld_emulation_xfer_type
ld_elf32_sparc_emulation;
> ./ld/ldemul-list.h:5: &ld_elf32_sparc_emulation, \
You should also find it here
ld/eelf32_sparc.c:struct ld_emulation_xfer_struct ld_elf32_sparc_emulation
=
eelf32_sparc.c is built by genscripts.sh from emultempl/elf32.em and
other files, so it might be that genscripts.sh is not being
interpreted correctly by your shell.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM