[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/11225] New: objdump -j silently ignore bad section name
From: |
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/11225] New: objdump -j silently ignore bad section name |
Date: |
27 Jan 2010 13:56:43 -0000 |
address@hidden gdbserver-1]$ objdump -s -j fpp /bin/ls
/bin/ls: file format elf64-x86-64
address@hidden gdbserver-1]$ echo $?
0
address@hidden gdbserver-1]$
I was expecting an error, at least a warning.
--
Summary: objdump -j silently ignore bad section name
Product: binutils
Version: 2.21 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11225
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/11225] New: objdump -j silently ignore bad section name,
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/01/28
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/01/28
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/01/28
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/01/28
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, 2010/01/28
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org, 2010/01/28
- [Bug binutils/11225] objdump -j silently ignore bad section name, nickc at redhat dot com, 2010/01/28