[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/17226] ld --gc-sections segfaults on sparc-linux
From: |
amodra at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/17226] ld --gc-sections segfaults on sparc-linux |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 23:08:30 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17226
Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #7738|0 |1
is obsolete| |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |amodra at gmail dot com
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 7739
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7739&action=edit
counter-proposal patch
There shouldn't be any need to test local_got_refcounts for NULL, if
gc_sweep_hook logic exactly matches check_relocs, and by inspection there's a
typo that probably is the cause of this bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/17226] New: ld --gc-sections segfaults on sparc-linux, mikpelinux at gmail dot com, 2014/08/03
- [Bug ld/17226] ld --gc-sections segfaults on sparc-linux, mikpelinux at gmail dot com, 2014/08/03
- [Bug ld/17226] ld --gc-sections segfaults on sparc-linux, mikpelinux at gmail dot com, 2014/08/03
- [Bug ld/17226] ld --gc-sections segfaults on sparc-linux,
amodra at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug ld/17226] ld --gc-sections segfaults on sparc-linux, mikpelinux at gmail dot com, 2014/08/04
- [Bug ld/17226] ld --gc-sections segfaults on sparc-linux, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2014/08/04
- [Bug ld/17226] ld --gc-sections segfaults on sparc-linux, amodra at gmail dot com, 2014/08/04