[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so
From: |
gingold at adacore dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:35:12 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698
gingold at adacore dot com <gingold at adacore dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |gingold at adacore dot com
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #7 from gingold at adacore dot com <gingold at adacore dot com> ---
Hello,
I think the patch is not correct.
Unless --target is specified, it creates archives using the "plugin" target,
which may not be compatible with the target. For example, the archive format
on IBM AIX is not compatible with the "plugin" one.
I think the ar.c:open_inarch lines:
if (target == NULL)
target = plugin_target;
should be moved (target shouldn't be overridden when creating a new target).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically,
gingold at adacore dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically, markus at trippelsdorf dot de, 2014/09/22
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically, gingold at adacore dot com, 2014/09/22
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically, gingold at adacore dot com, 2014/09/22
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically, markus at trippelsdorf dot de, 2014/09/22